Sticking it to the little guy
How
unions stole $35 million from Michigan's in-home child care and
home help providers
First posted April 17, 2012;
last updated November 2, 2012 |
Home |
Let's talk about exploitation of poor and middle class workers.
Through two separate scams over the last few years,
unions took $36 million from workers whose earnings are already on
the low end of the scale: people who provide child day care in their
homes and people who help the elderly and disabled in their homes.
In January 2009, the Department
of Human Services began deducting 1.15% from the state payments to
about 40,500 home-based child day care providers. DHS turned the
money over to a union called the Child Care Providers Together Michigan
(CCPTM), a
joint enterprise of the UAW and AFSCME. (Here
is the first edition of CCPTM's newsletter). The operation continued through February 2011, and the total take was $4,774,869.50 (source).
Through a similar arrangement that started in 2005, the Michigan
Department of Community Health deducted 2.75% (source) from payments to 55,000
home help providers and turned it over to
SEIU Healthcare
Michigan. (SEIU is the Service Employees International Union).
Those deductions continue to the present, and the total is now over
$32 million.
|
$4,774,870 |
taken
from in-home day care providers and given to CCPTM |
|
$32,651,000 |
taken from home help providers and given to SEIU Healthcare
Michigan |
|
$37,425,870 |
total |
What did the unions do
for these workers in return for $37,000,000? Little, if any.
The problem was that this was no
traditional collective bargaining setting. The day care
providers had no employer; they were independent business owners, often
with their own employees. The home help providers were employed by the people they cared
for; essentially, each had a different employer, and most of the
time it was an elderly or disabled relative. Although both
groups received payments from the state, they were not state
employees.
So to make the unions appear legitimate, an employer was
found for
each. For SEIU Healthcare
Michigan, it was the Michigan Quality Community Care Council (MQCCC).
The MQCCC has been in existence since April 2004 (source,
page 2),
formed through an interlocal agreement between
Michigan Department of Community Health and the
Tri-County Aging
Consortium. (Interlocal agreements are
explained
here.) Its purpose is to support the
Medicaid-funded
Home Help program,
which pays people to
assist those who cannot adequately care for themselves in their own
homes. The program has been in existence
since 1981,
operated by the Adult Service Division of the Michigan Department of
Human Services. It provides a much less costly alternative to nursing home
care. To ease the task of finding appropriate helpers, MQCCC
maintains a registry of Home Help providers. Before listing a
provider, the MQCCC checks references, checks the sex offender
registry, and checks to see of the person has a criminal record. It
also provides training. In addition to the savings from
keeping people out of nursing homes, MQCCC saves the state money by
checking the Home Help payroll against the Unemployment Insurance
payroll and reporting those who were receiving UCB's ineligibly.
For Child Care Providers Together Michigan (CCPTM), the "employer" was the
Michigan Home Based
Child Care Council (MHBCCC), formed through
an interlocal agreement between the Michigan Department of Human
Services and Mott Community College. Unlike the MQCCC, the MHBCCC's
main reason for existence seems to have been to act as an employer
for purposes of collective bargaining. The interlocal
agreement stated that MHBCCC was
formed "to assist the Department in carrying out its duties and
functions, including licensing, regulating, assisting, providing
training for, and administering the subsidy payments to eligible
home based child care providers." (source)
It also says:
The
Council shall have the right to bargain collectively and enter
into agreements with labor organizations, including those
representing Council employees and Providers. The Council shall
fulfill its responsibilities as a public employer subject to
1947 Public Act 336, MCL 423.201 to 423.217 with respect to all
its employees. (Source: the video in
this
story. Public Act 336 of 1947, as amended, is the
Public Employment Relations Act.)
The
MHBCCC had a suite of offices at 3186 Pine
Tree Road in Lansing, a website that no longer exists and an
impressive board of directors,
including Karla Swift, who was elected
president of the Michigan AFL-CIO in October 2011.
Each union
filed a petition with the Michigan Employment Relations Commission (MERC)
seeking to organize against its newly-found employer.
In
the SEIU Healthcare Michigan election,
held in the spring of 2005, 8,545 of the 43,000 home health care workers voted, 6,949 in favor
and 1,007 against, with 589 spoiled ballots.
In the CCPTM
election, held in the fall of 2006, only 6,396
of the 40,500 home day care providers voted. 5,921 favored the union
and 475 opposed. (source)
In both cases, many
providers claimed they never got a ballot and were not aware of the
election.
Since Michigan has no law requiring public notice of public employee
representation elections, hardly anyone knew about the elections.
(source)
For the unions, this was a gold mine. Since there was no employer in
the traditional sense, there was no collective bargaining; "wages"
were set by the state legislature. The unions didn't even have to
collect the dues - the state did it for them. There was nothing for
the unions to do but
sit back and rake in the money.
How did this happen? Because the Democratic administration of
Governor Jennifer Granholm wanted it to happen. Millions of dollars
for the unions meant millions of dollars for Democratic politicians.
The involvement of the Granholm administration is pretty clear in
the case of MHBCCC and CCPTM. In an email obtained by the Mackinac
Center for Public Policy, Nick Ciaramitaro, director of legislation
and public policy for AFSCME Council 25, says:
In
many ways, this is an experiment with little guidance from
statute and virtually no administrative or judicial precedent to
follow. ... The Interlocal Agreement came about at the
recommendation of Michigan AFSCME and the UAW with the support
of the Executive Office. (source)
And here
is Governor Granholm herself, addressing a 2008 AFSCME
conference:
In
Michigan, because of the partnership between AFSCME
and the governor' office, this means that 45,000 new
AFSCME members - quality child care providers - will
be on the ground providing care for children. That
is great for our state.
Granholm's
speech is part of a 6-minute video embedded in
this Mackinac Center story.
So far, little evidence has been found of the Granholm
administration's involvement in the collective
bargaining arrangement with
MQCCC and SEIU Healthcare. But little was needed.
The "employer" - MQCCC - already existed. All SEIU Healthcare had to do was
get the Michigan Employment Relations Commission to
conduct an election.
Cutting off the money flow
In September 2009, the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation brought suit
before the Michigan Court of Appeals against the DHS and its
director on behalf two day care home owners, asking that the
deduction of union dues be stopped. At about the same time, the
state House of Representatives removed the appropriation for MHBCCC
from the state budget for fiscal year 2010 (Michigan's fiscal year
starts in October). The Court of Appeals rejected the lawsuit with
no explanation and MHBCCC continued to operate without specific funding, surviving
instead on money from DHS' own budget (source).
In February of 2010, the Senate included language in a DHS appropriation
bill prohibiting money from being used to fund the "Michigan
Home-Based Child Care Council" or to pay for collecting union dues
from independent home day contractors. In May, a attempt was made -
and defeated - to tie-bar the Senate bill to a House bill that established new regulations for child care providers.
On September 15, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court
ordered the Court of Appeals to explain its rejection of the
Mackinac Center's lawsuit. In its
response, the Court of Appeals again neglected to address the
merits of the case.
In December of 2010, the Mackinac Center submitted an appeal to the
Michigan Supreme Court to overturn the dismal of its lawsuit by the
Court of Appeals. But something happened in November that was the
beginning of the end for the deduction of dues from day care
providers: Republican Rick Snyder was elected governor, defeating
Democrat (and Lansing mayor) Virg Bernero. In January 2011, soon after Snyder
replaced term-limited Governor Granholm, he
appointed Michigan Supreme Court judge Maura Corrigan as director of
the Department of Human Services, and on March 1, she
announced that DHS would stop funding the
MHBCCC.
She also stopped
dues
deductions as of March 18, saying "these providers are not state
employees.”
The announcement also said that
DHS' Child Development and Care program . . . ensures child care
providers have the skills and knowledge to provide safe and
stimulating environments for more than 60,000 children in their
care. DHS also has implemented a basic training requirement for
unlicensed aides and relatives providing care, in partnership
with the Early Childhood Investment Corp. Michigan is one of the
first states to require such mandatory training before providers
receive payment.
With all the attention paid to MHBCCC and CCPTM, no one seemed to
notice the similar arrangement between
MQCCC and SEIU Healthcare
Michigan. MIRS
(the subscription-only Michigan Information & Research Service)
questioned outgoing Governor Granholm about in December 2010, but it
wasn't until May 2011 that the legislature took action, eliminating
funding for MQCCC for fiscal year 2012, which would allow the
operation to continue through September. As it turned out, MQCCC
kept right on going after September. Cutting off funding didn't work
when the legislature tried to kill CCPTM and it didn't stop MQCCC. The agency found funding elsewhere. (source)
Defunding was the wrong move for another reason. MQCCC actually
provided a valuable service by connecting people in need of care
with Home Help providers, keeping them out of nursing homes. It also
reported people to
the Unemployment Insurance Agency when it found that they were
receiving UCBs and Home Help payments at the same time. Unless those functions could be
taken over by another agency, destroying MQCCC was like throwing the
baby out with the bath water.
In January 2011, House Bill 4003 was introduced.
It amended the Public Employment Relations Act to make it clear that
someone is not considered a government employee just because all or
part of his private employment compensation comes from a government
subsidy. The bill didn't pass the full House until June 8. It went
immediately to the Senate, but didn't get out of committee until
December 1. Finally, on March 21, 2012 - nine months after it passed
the House - the full Senate passed Senate Bill 1018, its version of
House Bill 4003. It was signed by Governor Snyder on April 10. It
makes two changes to PERA. The first one is to Section 1(i):
(i)
Beginning March 31, 1997, a
A
person employed by a
private organization or entity that
who
provides services under a
time-limited contract with the
this
state or a political
subdivision of
the this
state
or who receives a
direct or indirect government subsidy in his or her private
employment is not
an employee of the
this
state or that political
subdivision, and is not a public employee.
This provision shall not be superseded by any interlocal
agreement, memorandum of understanding, memorandum of
commitment, or other document similar to these.
The second change adds this to Section 14:
(2) An election
shall not be directed for, and the commission or a public
employer shall not recognize, a bargaining unit of a public
employer consisting of individuals who are not public
employees. A bargaining unit that is formed or recognized in
violation of this subsection is invalid and void.
In a May 11, 2012
letter
to Marion Owens, Director of the Tri-County Aging Consortium, DCH
Director Olga Dazzo said
The Michigan
Department of Community Health is sending you this Notice to
Terminate the Agreement as provided in Article VIII,
Section 8.02(3) of the Interlocal Agreement. By the terms of the
Agreement, it will terminate eleven months after you receive
this Notice to Terminate the Agreement.
And an
email soon after from
Governor Snyder's office said
The collective
bargaining agreement remains in effect through September 20,
2012 unless amended by mutual written agreement.
On May 25, Attorney General Bill Schuette
declared that
"In order to comply with the law, State agencies should end the
withholding of public union dues from private individuals who
provide home help." See
story by mlive.com's Dave Murray.
Then, on May 30, SEIU Healthcare filed a
federal lawsuit in federal court against the Snyder administration, and on June 20, U.S. District Judge Nancy
Edmunds ordered the state to continue deducting dues for SEIU
Healthcare until the contract expires in February (source).
In the meantime, SEIU
Heathcare is conducting a petition drive to put a constitutional
amendment on the November ballot to make MQCCC a permanent entity
and to allow it to continue to collect dues on behalf of the union. You can see the text of the proposal
here.
I don't see how a moral person could support what happened here.
Since 2007, unions skimmed $36 million from government payments
meant for the neediest of Michigan citizens and provided no services
in return. We know that the Granholm administration was instrumental
in this effort, but why did it take so long for the legislature to
put a stop to it?
Bills were introduced in the Senate in February 2010 to prohibit the
Michigan Employment Relations Commission from recognizing a
bargaining unit consisting of individuals who are not public
employees. Those bills never got out of committee.
House bill 4003,
essentially the same
as the 2010 Senate bills, was introduced May 16, 2011. It passed the
House on June 8, 2011 with all Republicans voting in favor and all
Democrats voting against. The Senate version didn't get voted on
until March 22, 2012, with all Democrats voting against and all but
one Republican voting in favor.
There are 47 Democratic representatives and 13 Democratic senators.
Among those 60 Democrats, one would hope that at least one would see
that taking union dues out of the state subsidies for day care
providers and home help providers would be wrong. None did.
The one Republican senator who voted with the Democrats was
Roger
Kahn of Saginaw. He also worked behind the scenes to find another
source of funding for MQCCC. His activities are revealed in several
documents obtained by the Mackinac Center through the Freedom of
Information Act and discussed in
this
October 31, 2011 story. Other names that come up are
Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville of Monroe, Senator John
Moolenaar of Midland and Representative Matt Lori of Constantine -
all Republicans. It is not clear if they wanted to preserve the
functions of MQCCC or keep the dues flowing to SEIU Healthcare
Michigan.
But it does seem that
Roger Kahn is an SEIU Healthcare favorite. The SEIU Healthcare PAC
made 19 "expenditures" over $100 from 2006-2012 and five of them
went to Senator Kahn:
Date |
Amount |
|
3/7/2008 |
$5000 |
|
7/7/2010 |
$600 |
|
10/8/2010 |
$2000 |
|
2/16/2011 |
$500 |
(this one was "in kind": valentines tickets) |
6/9/2011 |
$5000 |
|
Among
the other expenditures were $5000 to the Michigan Democratic Party
on 10/28/2008 and $20,000 to the Michigan House Democratic Fund on
10/28/2010.
**************************************************
Most of
the
information for this story came from articles on the website of the
Mackinac Center for Public Policy. I've compiled a fairly complete
chronological list of those articles
here.
And here are the websites for
SEIU Heathcare Michigan
and the
Michigan Quality Community Care
Council.
Send comments to
stevenrharry@gmail.com. Also, please let me know if you find any
inaccuracies in this story.
**************************************************
Peter Luke's April 19
column in
Bridge contains some information relevant to the Home Help program.
He says:
According
to a Thomson Reuters
report
last fall on state Medicaid
spending,
Michigan spends much more on
nursing home care and much less
on home- and community-based
assistance than most other
states.
In 2009, just 21 percent of
long-term care dollars for the
aged (about $426 million) was
spent on services that enable an
elderly person to stay in his
home. More than 78 percent,
nearly $1.6 billion, was spent
on far more expensive care in
nursing homes.
In Minnesota, by contrast, the
percentages were 60 percent home
care and 40 percent nursing
homes.
AARP Michigan, which is
advocating for a better balance,
estimates the cost difference
between community-based care and
nursing home care at more than
$57,000 per year per recipient.
Apply Minnesota’s efficiencies
to Michigan and the savings
would be enormous — more than
enough to keep families with
young children out of the
despair of extreme poverty.
|