Whatever happened to the SERS and
MPSERS 13th check?
Originally posted, December 21, 2013;
updated February 11, 2014
|
Home
Directory
|
[See Detroit Free Press reporter Paul Egan's
April 27, 2014 story
and
April 29 Lansing State Journal editorial.]
The phenomenon of the 13th check goes
back at least to the early 1980s. It is a clever idea for siphoning
off money from pension funds. It works like this: In years when
pension fund earnings are higher than, say, 8%, the excess earnings
are divided up and distributed to the pension recipients. This is
from a
report of an investigation into the causes of the Detroit
bankruptcy by Detroit Free Press reporters Nathan Bomey and John Gallagher:
Pension officials handed out about $1 billion in bonuses from the
city’s two pension funds to retirees and active city workers from
1985 to 2008. That money — mostly in the form of so-called 13th
checks — could have shored up the funds and possibly prevented the
city from filing for bankruptcy. If that money had been saved, it
would have been worth more than $1.9 billion today to the city and
pension funds, by one expert’s estimate.
It's a crazy idea. Pensioners get a
bonus when a strong stock market results in big gains for the
pension fund, but they don't suffer when stocks are down. It is
a great deal for them, not so great for the taxpayers who are forced
to make up the difference when those pension funds are short.
Wayne County also has a 13th check
provision. Here's what county executive Robert Ficano said about it
in a June 24, 2012
letter to the Detroit Free Press:
The impact of the
13th checks [on Wayne County's pension fund] has been severe. The
annual bonus payouts alone have drained the fund of $391.9 million
since 1986, and $91.5 million since I took office in 2003. The pension fund's
actuarial service, Gabriel Roeder Smith & Co., wrote in September of
2010: "We estimate that the Wayne County Employees Retirement System
would be approximately 90% funded on a funding value basis as of the
last actuarial valuation (Sept 30, 2009) if there had never been a
13th check program."
Bay City has a 13th check program,
although no distributions are made unless pensions are 100% funded:
Started in 1999 and
discontinued in 2006, the 13th check program cost the Bay City
police and fire pension system at least $2 million in
distributions and lost interest earnings, according to Bay
City's Chief Accountant Cathy Szostak. The pension fund is not
100 percent funded now, partly as a result of that. (MLive.com,
September 15, 2013)
So does
St. Clair County. And it is not just a Michigan thing.
San Diego's program has been
in the news recently.
The State of Michigan has a 13th check
provision for its public school employees (MPSERS) and state
employees (SERS) retirement systems. Nearly $900 million has been
distributed since 1982, but none after 2002. (Notes on the sources of data for the following table
are
here.)
|
School Employees (MPSERS) |
|
|
State
Employees (SERS) |
|
Investment
Earnings % |
Total Payout |
Number of Retirees |
Av. Payout per Retiree |
|
|
Investment
Earnings % |
Total Payout |
Number of Retirees |
Av. Payout per Retiree |
1982 |
10.18 |
20,181,937 |
55,257 |
365.24 |
|
1982 |
10.16 |
8,799,963 |
16,867 |
521.73 |
1983 |
13.04 |
27,635,519 |
57,854 |
477.68 |
|
1983 |
13.32 |
11,701,708 |
17,788 |
657.84 |
1984 |
10.20 |
18,812,744 |
60,435 |
311.29 |
|
1984 |
10.32 |
9,550,868 |
19,423 |
491.73 |
1985 |
9.72 |
12,402,714 |
63,184 |
196.30 |
|
1985 |
9.84 |
11,045,319 |
20,869 |
529.27 |
1986 |
12.85 |
173,791,208 |
69,001 |
2,518.68 |
|
1986 |
12.75 |
65,006,434 |
21,271 |
3,056.11 |
1987 |
16.5 |
236,993,278 |
73,316 |
3,232.49 |
|
1987 |
15.8 |
75,214,272 |
21,873 |
3,438.60 |
1988 |
7.1 |
|
76,111 |
|
|
1988 |
8.1 |
|
23,008 |
|
1989 |
9.8 |
28,088,593 |
79,917 |
351.47 |
|
1989 |
10.1 |
15,488,627 |
24,187 |
640.37 |
1990 |
8.3 |
1,224,050 |
83,286 |
14.70 |
|
1990 |
8.4 |
134,184 |
24,863 |
5.40 |
1991 |
7.4 |
|
86,253 |
|
|
1991 |
7.2 |
|
25,566 |
|
1992 |
5.8 |
|
90,201 |
|
|
1992 |
5.9 |
|
28,856 |
|
1993 |
7.1 |
|
93,574 |
|
|
1993 |
7.1 |
|
29,175 |
|
1994 |
6.1 |
|
97,989 |
|
|
1994 |
6.1 |
|
29,962 |
|
1995 |
7.4 |
|
103,151 |
|
|
1995 |
7.5 |
|
30,562 |
|
1996 |
8.9 |
58,800,478 |
107,465 |
547.16 |
|
1996 |
8.9 |
15,234,884 |
31,093 |
489.98 |
1997 |
23.6 |
6,228,619 |
111,842 |
55.69 |
|
1997 |
23.2 |
24,832,674 |
36,123 |
687.45 |
1998 |
8.3 |
5,992,263 |
116,620 |
51.38 |
|
1998 |
8.2 |
|
36,185 |
|
1999 |
16.1 |
9,406,311 |
120,913 |
77.79 |
|
1999 |
16.3 |
678,314 |
36,346 |
18.66 |
2000 |
14.5 |
11,464,638 |
126,115 |
90.91 |
|
2000 |
14.8 |
435,904 |
36,705 |
11.88 |
2001 |
(11.5) |
13,799,341 |
130,790 |
105.51 |
|
2001 |
(11.5) |
378,467 |
37,111 |
10.20 |
2002 |
(10.5) |
16,574,185 |
135,277 |
122.52 |
|
2002 |
(10.3) |
|
39,666 |
|
2003 |
14.8 |
|
139,814 |
|
|
2003 |
14.7 |
|
45,491 |
|
2004 |
12.6 |
|
145,378 |
|
|
2004 |
12.4 |
|
45,619 |
|
2005 |
12.8 |
|
151,706 |
|
|
2005 |
12.8 |
|
45,801 |
|
2006 |
12.8 |
|
157,163 |
|
|
2006 |
12.8 |
|
45,980 |
|
2007 |
17.2 |
|
162,844 |
|
|
2007 |
17.2 |
|
46,886 |
|
2008 |
(12.3) |
|
167,265 |
|
|
2008 |
(12.5) |
|
48,078 |
|
2009 |
(6.1) |
|
171,922 |
|
|
2009 |
(6.3) |
|
49,029 |
|
2010 |
8.8 |
|
187,722 |
|
|
2010 |
8.5 |
|
50,462 |
|
2011 |
6.6 |
|
192,435 |
|
|
2011 |
6.5 |
|
55,648 |
|
2012 |
13.5 |
|
196,661 |
|
|
2012 |
13.4 |
|
56,288 |
|
2013 |
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
2013 |
11.4 |
|
|
|
Total Payout: |
$641,395,878 |
|
|
|
Total Payout: |
$238,501,631 |
|
|
For the table, I calculated average
payout per recipient by dividing total payout by number of retirees,
but recipients don't all get the same amount. Each recipient's share
is determined by the number of "units" he has. He gets one unit for
each year of service he had at retirement and one unit for each year
he's been retired. So while the average payout for SERS retirees in
1987 was $3,438.60, some got a lot more and others got a lot less.
The 13th check provision is
state law. For state
employees, it is
Section 38.20g of the
State
Employees' Retirement Act, Act 240 of 1943.
For public school employees, it is
Section 38.1404a of the
Public
School Employees Retirement Act of 1979, Act 300 of 1980.
I've attempted to read those sections in an attempt to understand
the current status of the 13th check, but I just can't do it. That
stuff is too complicated for me. I've also
attempted to get answers from state officials, with little
success. But
I did find brief explanations in the 2012 Comprehensive Annual
Financial Reports (CAFR) for the two systems. Here is what it says
in the
SERS CAFR (page 82):
Post-Retirement Cost-of-Living Adjustments
One-time upward adjustments have been made in
1972, 1974, 1976, 1977 and 1987. Beginning in 1983, some benefit
recipients share in a distribution of a portion of investment
income earned in excess of 8% annually (supplemental payment).
Beginning in 1988, all benefit recipients are eligible for
automatic 3% annual (non-compounded) benefit increases, with a
maximum $300 annual increase. Eligibility for the above
benefits:
Retired before October 1, 1987 |
Greater of supplemental payment or the combination
of the 1987 one-time adjustment and the automatic
increases. |
Retired on or after October 1, 1987 |
Automatic increases only. |
Here is what it says in the
MPSERS CAFR (page 88):
Post-Retirement Cost-of-Living Adjustments
One-time upward adjustments have been made in 1972, 1974, 1976
and 1977 for members retired on or after July 1, 1956, and prior
to July 1, 1976, who were eligible for Social Security benefits.
For members who retired prior to July 1, 1956, and not eligible
for Social Security benefits based upon membership service, the
minimum base pension was increased in 1965, 1971, 1972, 1974 and
1981, and in 1976 and 1977 one-time upward adjustments were
made.
Beginning in 1983, eligible recipients received an annual
distribution of investment earnings in excess of 8%
(supplemental payment). On January 1, 1986, all members who
retired prior to January 1, 1986, were given a permanent 8%
increase. On January 1, 1990, a one-time upward adjustment for
members who retired prior to October 1, 1981, was made.
Currently members receive annual increases based on the
following schedule:
Retired before January 1, 1987 - Greater of
Supplemental payment or automatic 3% increase
Retired on or after January 1, 1987 under MIP - Automatic 3%
increase only
Retired on or after January 1, 1987 not under MIP -
Supplemental payment only
The above explanations make it clear that the 13th
check ("supplemental payment") goes to only part of the retiree
population, so the averages I calculated in the table above are
misleading. Fewer recipients means individual payouts would be
higher.
What I would like to know is why there have been no
13th checks issued since 2002. Earnings on pension funds have been
well above 8% for some of those years, and although the COLA
("automatic") increases eat up part of the excess, some retirees -
like the MPSERS retirees who retired on or after January 1, 1987 and
are not in the Member Investment Program (MIP) - aren't eligible for
COLA increases.
And if it is just a matter of insufficient earnings
on pension funds, what happens if they have a really big year?
The S&P 500 is expected to grow by 25% this year, and with the
salary increases recently received by investment officials in the
state Department of Treasury, we can certainly expect pension fund
earnings to beat the S&P 500:
Jon Braeutigam, the state’s chief investment officer, got a
90% pay raise to $333,000 a year from $175,000, department
spokesman Terry Stanton confirmed Friday. Treasury’s two senior
directors of investment — Robert Brackenbury and Greg Parker —
received 82% pay increases, boosting them from $128,000 to
$233,000 a year. (Detroit
Free Press, November 24, 2013)
I finally did get a genuine attempt at
explaining the situation from the Office of Retirement Systems. In a
letter dated January 16, Steve Crippen of
ORS assures us that no further 13th checks are likely to be issued -
ever. I'm afraid I still don't understand how this all works, but I
guess it doesn't matter.
|