Public Policy
  Analysis, opinion & ideas from Steve Harry

Directory

About/Contact

Minimal services for homeless adults at Holy Cross

October 14, 2022

 

Following is a report given to me by its author. Other than redacting names and personal information and adding a photo, I am presenting it as received. I've added notes at the end.

 

 

 

REPORT ON MY EXPERIENCE AT HOLY CROSS

By Lee (my middle name), MSW

I went to work in early August for Holy Cross Services at 430 N. Larch Street in Lansing, Michigan, with the best of intentions.

I had been sent to Holy Cross by an employment agency, who told me that I would be working to find housing for homeless persons.  I was interested.

I went there on a Monday and was shown to the office of Nancy Oliver, the director.  The interview went fine, although I remember feeling a bit uncomfortable.  Then two things happened.  The director told me that I would be working on the second shift, which was a custodial job.  I was confused. I thought this was a social work job, which would have been consistent with my resume.

Had she even looked at my resume?  Did she know that I was a social worker? I wondered.

The rest of the day, I trained at the front desk with Robin, the receptionist.  I learned that as part of my job on the second shift, I would be carrying heavy loads of sheets and towels to the dorms for the new residents.  I would be breaking up fights, and I would be giving Narcan injections to people who were overdosing.  And I would be there alone, with no backup.

This was a little more than I bargained for.  I became more and more confused.  I had been told by the agency that had hired me that this was a social work job, but it sure didn’t seem like one.

The second thing that happened at my interview was also confusing.  The director told me that she had been staring at me because I was the spitting image of her mother.  She said that I looked like her mother and that my mannerisms were like her mother.  She came over to me and showed me a picture of her mother on her cell phone.

I didn’t really see a resemblance but I didn’t say anything.  But again, I felt uncomfortable.  I realized later that by saying this, my relationship with her changed from a professional relationship to one that was personal and even a family relationship.  It altered the dynamic between us, and it opened the way for transference from her to me.

I went home that night and couldn’t sleep.  I decided to go in the next day and confront the director and ask if there was a social work job available.

But when I went in on the Tuesday, the director was not there, so I went to Michael, the assistant director, who was the next in charge.  I told him I thought my skills would better be utilized during the day shift.  I told him that I had quite a bit of experience running groups and doing case management.

He immediately agreed with me and told me that he would discuss this with the director, and that he would recommend that I work during the day shift.  I felt relieved.

I then began training under Lucy, the one case manager at Holy Cross, who began teaching me everything she knew.  But when I returned the following Monday, I learned that Lucy had been hospitalized over the weekend with a serious seizure.  During my time at Holy Cross, she never returned, and I had no one to train me. 

I realized that I was going to need to learn things on my own.

I did complete the training on the complex computer system, called HMIS, and I started to make phone calls to other community agencies to try to put together some knowledge about what was available to homeless persons through the other agencies.

At the same time, I was very curious to start meeting the participants of Holy Cross to see what their situations were – how they had become homeless, and what their goals were for housing.  I started to have one-on-one meetings with them to fill out housing plans and to start working with them on their plans for permanent housing.

Since there was a lack of government funding, I began to look for ways for the participants to move toward housing in other ways – by looking for jobs, or by looking for other subsidized options like HUD and other low-income housing.

I also looked for ways to work with people in getting their needed identification, and by identifying other areas of their lives where they needed help, ie: substance abuse and counseling issues.

On my first day at Holy Cross, I was given a tour of the building and shown the New Hope dayroom area at Holy Cross. I was shocked to see that the participants had no materials in the dayrooms – other than a TV mounted on the wall.  Many of them spent the day sitting with their heads in their hands, depressed.  Or they watched the one TV in the room all day.  Some lay on the floor, and some just sat at tables with their heads in their arms on the tables.  It was a dismal scene.

I wanted to make a change to this.  I wanted the participants to be able to use their minds.

I started a campaign with my neighbors in my senior independent living apartment complex to collect unused art supplies, books, puzzles, games, etc.  My friends were generous, and I began finding boxes and bags of such items outside my door in the morning.  I brought them to work, and pretty soon the dayroom had books, a really nice chess set, a scrabble game and Monopoly game, a collection of puzzles, activity books, crayons, markers, colored pencils and adult coloring books, etc.

The other thing I did was to start running groups three days of the week.  On Mondays at 9am, we had a housing group.  I had planned that once or twice a month, instead of the housing group, we would have a hygiene group, as this was badly needed. 

On Wednesdays at the same time, we had a mental health group where we discussed feelings and other mental health issues.  On Fridays, we would have a creativity and contest day, in which participants could earn bus passes and tokens for things like art, poetry, and writing contests, and competitive games like chess and dominoes.

These groups were a success.  There were approximately twelve or thirteen attendees in each group, which was a majority of the people in the dayroom at that time of day.  I tried to make the groups both interesting and fun.

I began to build a rapport with both the participants and the staff, who seemed to be encouraged by the things that were going on with the participants and the dayroom.

From my second day at Holy Cross, I began to realize that the staff at Holy Cross was both hard working and dedicated.  I liked everyone I was working with, and I think they liked me.  I even made friends with the kitchen staff.

The one exception to this was the director.  I tried several times to go to her office just to wish her a good day, but I didn’t feel comfortable with her.  She seemed to not like me – at least, that was the feeling I got from her.

One day, I went to her office and she told me that I seemed to be “floundering” at my job.  I was surprised.  Floundering to me means drowning.  I didn’t feel I was drowning at all.  I felt that with my lack of organized training, I was managing to survive quite well. 

Her lack of supportive language made me feel just that - not supported.  I began to avoid going into her office. This director stayed in her office at all times.  I never saw her once greet any of the participants.

In spite of these misgivings about the director, I felt happy working at Holy Cross, and felt that I was working with a supportive team.  I felt dedicated to the participants and just wanted to help them move from homelessness to permanent housing and a better life.  I had no agenda at Holy Cross other than to help the participants.

One thing that did happen during my last day at Holy Cross was that when I looked at participants’ records on HMIS, I had the feeling that something was not right.  I now suspect, and am now in the process of confirming with executives in other homeless agencies, that it is possible that Holy Cross is possibly collecting federal money for services they are actually not delivering.

For example, on my last day of employment at Holy Cross, I was doing an interview and a housing plan with a female participant, Danielle Allen.  One thing I did know was that each new participant at Holy Cross is required to have an online interview called a SPDAT after they had been housed at the shelter for fourteen days.  This paperwork would be forwarded to the office next door – Diane Singleton – and would be the start of the participant’s journey to getting a Section 8 voucher and subsequent housing.

When I looked through her record, I saw that a SPDAT had never been done on her, even though she had been living at the shelter for five or six months.  There were no case notes for her – not even one.  Her record showed that she had no income, no SSI.  She had not been sent to DHHS to apply for SSI.

She also had no ID.  No birth certificate, Michigan ID or Social Security card.  I was stunned.

I asked her if anyone had ever met with her to do a housing plan or talk about her housing goals, and she said No, No one.  So, she had been living at the shelter for six months with no services, even though I had been told that Holy Cross had been paid daily for services for her.

After she left my office, I started looking through other records on HMIS - a lot of other records.  And what I found shocked me.  The neglect that I had found with this female participant was not an exception, it was more often the norm.

Then I understood.  I understood why I was the only case manager there – the only one trying to help the participants

I understood why the food was substandard, why there were no supplies in the dayroom, why I had encountered resistance when I wanted to start the groups, and why these was no washer and dryer for the 30 or so residents on the first floor of the shelter. 

I understood why few housing services were being given to the residents at Holy Cross.  Instead, the residents were only being given bare bones care.  There was only one possible conclusion.

Where was the money going? I wondered.  And who was suffering?  The participants.

This was federal crime if it was true.  Stealing from the participants, if that was what was happening, was a federal crime, a crime against HUD and other agencies. I was astounded.  Who would steal from homeless people – the poorest of the poor? 

What happened next pulled the rug out from under me and left me in a state of shock.

At 4:30pm on 9/15, the director came unexpectedly into my office, which she had never done before.  I was preparing to leave for the day.  She looked around and asked if there was anyone else in the area, to which I said no.

At first the conversation seemed friendly and we chatted about little things.  She asked how I was doing, and I told her truthfully that I was doing fine.  Then the conversation changed.

She said that she was very concerned about my safety.  She didn’t like me working in the offices, even though during the day there is quite a bit of traffic in these offices.  I told her that I had never felt unsafe at any time at Holy Cross.  Actually, the only times I had felt uneasy at Holy Cross were when I was with her.  I thought that, but did not say it.

She continued to talk about my safety.  I knew there was an empty office upstairs, where most of the staff had their offices, so I suggested she move me up there.  However, she continued to insist that I was not safe.

Then, she began to talk about the budget.  She said that I was costing her too much money.  She said that if I was hired at Holy Cross instead of working through an agency, that I would be paid the same or less.  I was being paid $17 per hour by my agency, which I knew was below the norm for a case manager.

But she continued.  She said that she had several options.  Either she could move me to a permanent position manning the front desk, or a permanent position manning the New Hope dayroom, or she could have my agency find me a different position with another company.

I was stunned.  She wanted to fire me!  I started to feel cold.  

I told her several times that I preferred to stay at this job, but that no matter what the outcome was, I would deal with it, which is the truth.  I loved the job at Holy Cross, but if I was fired by her, I knew I would survive.  But I went into a state of shock.

She kept on talking about my safety, and she told me to think about all this and to get back to her the following day.  But her intention was clear.  I would no longer be working as a case manager.  And that she wanted to get rid of me.  Then she left and I gathered my things to go home.

I got home, and continued to try to process what had just happened. 

I called Michael, the assistant director and told him that I needed to work at home the next day, and he agreed.  I needed a day to think.  He asked me to document everything, which I did.  I worked on the report that night, and emailed it to him at about midnight.

Over the weekend, I thought a lot about all this.  The next day, I reported all this to the FBI.  I suspected fraud at Holy Cross.  But it was not up to me to prove this.  It was much bigger than I was.

Things then went from bad to worse for me.  I tried to text and email my friends at Holy Cross, but they did not respond.  Either they had been poisoned against me or they had been told not to communicate with me.  I can only imagine the lies they were told about me. 

They might have been threatened with termination if they did contact me.  I knew that they had young families and that job termination was not an option for them.  So, I understood.  But that did not make the situation any less painful for me.

I was very sad to lose my job at Holy Cross, but I also know that I am extremely resilient and that I would survive this turn of events.

I did not go back to work at Holy Cross the following Monday.  I cannot work in a toxic situation.  Been there, done that.  I will fight for my job, but I will fight from home until the dust clears.

I feel I did an amazing job at Holy Cross, especially in light of the fact that I had very little training.  Something happened for me at Holy Cross.  I fell in love with the job and with the participants.  My heart went out to them all.  I wanted to help them, and they all knew that I cared about them.

At this time, I am working at home and considering my options.  I know that somehow, I want to work in the homeless arena.  Because I genuinely care about the homeless people. 

When I left, I had started a campaign to get them all prepared for the winter.  I was trying to find resources to get them warm coats and boots and scarves and hats and blankets.  I just wanted them to survive the coming winter.

The last two things I have heard about Holy Cross are that 1. They have improved the food in the cafeteria.  When I was working at Holy Cross, I sometimes ate lunch in the cafeteria.  I went for the six weeks I was there without ever seeing a vegetable.  There was lettuce, plain lettuce and some Italian dressing, but no vegetables.

The rumor I heard was that the food had greatly improved, and I was glad.

And 2. I heard that the computers at Holy Cross were all on lock down.  Was that the doing of the FBI?  I had no way of knowing.

My hope is that somehow Holy Cross will be investigated and that the situation for the homeless people will become better.  Become the way it is supposed to be.  I realized that all the time I worked there, I was trying to make this happen.

But the problem was that the problem was bigger than I was.  I couldn’t possibly have done what I was trying to do which was to make Holy Cross work.

For the participants.

I am still hoping for this.

Lee

 

 

*

Homeless Management Information Systems (HMISs) are community-wide software solutions that are designed to capture client-level information over time on the characteristics and service needs of men, women, and children experiencing homelessness. In response to a Congressional directive, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has required all Continuums of Care (CoCs) across the country to implement HMIS at the local level. The primary goal of HMIS is to better understand the scope and dimensions of homelessness locally and nationally in order to address the problem more effectively. Through the implementation of advanced technology, HMIS also directly benefits service providers and homeless clients by providing more efficient and coordinated services. (source)

 

 

**

The Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (SPDAT) was developed as an assessment tool for frontline workers at agencies that work with homeless clients to prioritize which of those clients should receive assistance first. The SPDAT tools are also designed to help guide case management and improve housing stability outcomes. They provide an in-depth assessment that relies on the assessor’s ability to interpret responses and corroborate those with evidence. As a result, this tool may only be used by those who have received proper, up-to-date training provided by OrgCode Consulting, Inc. or an OrgCode certified trainer. (source)

 

 

Lansing homeless executive draws criticism for calling homeless 'undesirable' - Lansing State Journal, October 26, 2022

Holy Cross Services website

Grosse Pointe Park Man Sentenced for Scheme to Defraud and Steal Funds from Religious Charity

Michigan's Campaign to End Homelessness

 

Send comments, questions, and tips to stevenrharry@gmail.com or call or text me at 517-730-2638. If you'd like to be notified by email when I post a new story, let me know.

 

Previous stories