Old and new IAFF pension limits
compared
December 6, 2014
To
compare the old pension limit with the new limit agreed upon in
Lansing's new contract with the IAFF, signed April 29, 2014, I
selected pension information for several firefighters who retired in
2010 and 2011, before the Michigan legislature
passed
a law prohibiting public agencies from releasing details of
public employee pensions. As you can see, the new limit - 110% of
salary - comes out to be substantially higher than the old limit,
80% of final average compensation (FAC). Actually, the new limit is
110% of "base wage," whatever that is. I'm assuming it is annual
salary, which is tricky to calculate for firefighters in the fire
suppression division. Normally, I would calculate it by multiplying
hourly wage times 40 (hours per week) times 52 (weeks in a year),
but for retirees from the fire suppression division, I
calculate it as hourly rate
times 2799.94 (53.845 hours a week - see
Work Week
for Fire Suppression Division.
Although the new limit seems to be
higher, I can't see that it will make a difference, since pensions
are, in effect, 80% of FAC - the old limit. For firefighters hired
before
April 29, 2014, the
pension is calculated as FAC times 25 years times 3.2% (.032). .032
times 25 equals .8 (80%). So the old 80% of FAC pension limit was a
joke: no limit at all.
I have fairly complete
lists of retirements from both of the City's retirement systems
going back to 2010:
Police and Fire Retirement System
Employees Retirement System (ERS)
Name |
Fire Sup
Division? |
Retirement
Date |
Age |
Total
Service |
Purchased
Service |
Salary |
FAC |
Actual
Pension |
Old Limit:
80% of FAC |
New Limit:
110% of Salary |
Ness, David T. |
Y |
5/7/2010 |
47 y ? m |
25 y 8 m |
|
$78,958 |
$88,649 |
$70,919 |
$70,919.20 |
$86,853.80 |
Burnett, Todd E. |
Y |
6/14/2010 |
47 y 0 m |
25 y 0 m |
2 m |
$68,095 |
$77,266 |
$61,813 |
$61,812.80 |
$74,904.50 |
Fulger Jr., Charles J. |
|
6/14/2010 |
58 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
11 m |
$71,718 |
$81,574 |
$65,259 |
$65,259.20 |
$78,889.80 |
Ford, David R. |
Y |
6/21/2010 |
46 y ? m |
25 y 10 m |
|
$78,958 |
$87,945 |
$70,356 |
$70,356.00 |
$86,853.80 |
Walsdorf, Joseph R. |
Y |
6/21/2010 |
49 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
2 y 7 m |
$68,095 |
$79,183 |
$63,346 |
$63,346.40 |
$74,904.50 |
Huff Jr., Orval D. |
Y |
6/23/2010 |
53 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
2 m |
$68,095 |
$80,968 |
$64,774 |
$64,774.40 |
$74,904.50 |
Smith, Paul M. |
Y |
6/23/2010 |
45 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
2 m |
$78,958 |
$86,355 |
$69,084 |
$69,084.00 |
$86,853.80 |
Haueter, Peter L. |
Y |
6/26/2010 |
48 y 7 m |
25 y 0 m |
2 m |
$78,958 |
$89,187 |
$71,350 |
$71,349.60 |
$86,853.80 |
Perrone, Daniel A. |
Y |
6/30/2010 |
45 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
12 m |
$60,955 |
$69,382 |
$55,505 |
$55,505.60 |
$67,050.50 |
Doerr, David B. |
|
6/15/2011 |
50 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
|
$68,120 |
$77,264 |
$61,812 |
$61,811.20 |
$74,932.00 |
Kirchen, Thomas J. |
Y |
6/15/2011 |
55 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
|
$60,955 |
$71,103 |
$56,883 |
$56,882.40 |
$67,050.50 |
Squire, James E. |
Y |
6/15/2011 |
53 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
|
$68,095 |
$75,302 |
$60,242 |
$60,241.60 |
$74,904.50 |
Holden, Walter M. |
Y |
6/16/2011 |
51 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
|
$68,095 |
$77,860 |
$62,288 |
$62,288.00 |
$74,904.50 |
Tolbert, Jerome C. |
|
6/18/2011 |
59 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
11 m |
$71,718 |
$80,574 |
$64,459 |
$64,459.20 |
$78,889.80 |
Pulver, Lynn A. |
Y |
6/19/2011 |
49 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
|
$68,095 |
$80,767 |
$64,613 |
$64,613.60 |
$74,904.50 |
Christainsen, William |
Y |
6/24/2011 |
55 y ? m |
25 y 8 m |
|
$78,958 |
$91,328 |
$73,062 |
$73,062.40 |
$86,853.80 |
Peacock, Matthew A. |
Y |
6/30/2011 |
46 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
|
$78,958 |
$90,657 |
$72,526 |
$72,525.60 |
$86,853.80 |
Wojtysiak, Mark |
Y |
6/30/2011 |
47 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
|
$78,958 |
$91,586 |
$73,269 |
$73,268.80 |
$86,853.80 |
Miller, Dennis L. |
Y |
7/1/2011 |
53 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
|
$68,095 |
$87,860 |
$70,288 |
$70,288.00 |
$74,904.50 |
Sabon, Philip D. |
|
7/1/2011 |
49 y ? m |
25 y 0 m |
2 m |
$78,478 |
$95,398 |
$76,318 |
$76,318.40 |
$86,325.80 |
|