Library doesn't answer
questions
June 8, 2024
I have published
payroll
information on this website for the City of Lansing, the Board of
Water & Light and Capital Area Transportation Authority. On April 9, I sent
a FOIA request for payroll
information for the Capital Area District Library (CADL). Jenny Marr, CADL executive director, responded by
email on April 11 with a
spreadsheet attached. I looked it over and sent this:
|
Jenny, there is nothing in the union
affiliation and bargaining unit columns. Are CADL employees not
unionized? By the way, that was the quickest I've ever received
a response to a FOIA request. |
|
She replied
|
Hello Steve, CADL does not keep a cohesive
record of union affiliation, but we can provide whether Union
dues were paid. Does this satisfy your request? Please see
attached. |
|
The attached file was a list of
dues paid in 2023.
On further examination of the payroll information, I
noticed that Miscellaneous payments for several employees was
surprisingly high. For 30 of them, it was over $10,000. The highest was
$38,115,58 for former
director Scott Duimstra - who left on October 6, 2023:
Last name |
First name |
Position |
Hire date |
Term date |
Hrly Rate |
Reg Wages |
Overtime |
Misc Wages |
Total earnings |
Duimstra |
Scott |
DIRECTOR |
03/21/2005 |
10/06/2023 |
72.12 |
95,843.05 |
|
38,115.58 |
133,958.63 |
Laxton |
Juliet |
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR |
08/09/1999 |
|
61.07 |
97,883.26 |
|
22,867.94 |
120,751.20 |
Knox |
Sheryl |
IT DIRECTOR |
01/09/2002 |
|
61.07 |
98,324.30 |
|
22,397.82 |
120,722.12 |
Smiley |
Trenton |
|
01/05/2004 |
05/17/2023 |
55.28 |
39,599.04 |
|
19,892.96 |
59,492.00 |
Harper |
Lynn |
LIBRARY HEAD 1 |
01/05/2004 |
|
32.62 |
50,919.68 |
|
16,055.58 |
66,975.26 |
Lindemann |
Cheryl |
SELECTION SPECIALIST |
05/06/2002 |
|
41.35 |
67,960.13 |
|
15,382.33 |
83,342.46 |
Stanton |
Eric |
PUBLIC SERVICE LIBRARIAN |
09/12/2005 |
|
31.42 |
48,010.18 |
|
15,312.41 |
63,322.59 |
Hamlin |
Jolee |
|
11/14/2005 |
|
53.40 |
93,264.05 |
|
15,148.05 |
108,412.10 |
Maclean |
James |
HEAD OF COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS |
03/16/1998 |
|
38.78 |
64,567.46 |
|
14,839.52 |
79,406.98 |
Rousseau |
Thais |
ASSOC DIRECTOR OF COLLECTION |
12/17/2007 |
|
46.23 |
76,595.86 |
|
14,818.56 |
91,414.42 |
Shilts |
Thomas |
YOUTH LIBRARIAN |
04/28/2003 |
|
33.70 |
53,307.25 |
|
14,678.09 |
67,985.34 |
Goodrich |
Jessica |
BUSINESS OUTREACH LIBRARIAN |
11/04/2013 |
|
32.62 |
48,641.36 |
|
14,424.81 |
63,066.17 |
Butler |
Heidi |
LOCAL HISTORY LIBRARIAN |
02/24/2014 |
|
32.62 |
51,682.63 |
|
14,092.66 |
65,775.29 |
Potts |
Christopher |
PUBLIC SERVICE LIBRARIAN |
07/12/2010 |
|
28.49 |
43,680.70 |
|
13,756.12 |
57,436.82 |
Moore |
Michael |
|
02/17/2020 |
|
44.92 |
76,224.10 |
|
13,446.30 |
89,670.40 |
Degroat |
Jennifer |
LIBRARY HEAD 1 |
09/23/2003 |
|
32.77 |
52,048.32 |
|
13,352.32 |
65,400.64 |
Goupil |
Heather |
LIBRARY HEAD 1 |
08/09/2002 |
|
32.94 |
53,798.77 |
|
12,596.44 |
66,395.21 |
Chrisinske |
Julie |
LIBRARY HEAD 1 |
08/11/2008 |
|
32.77 |
55,268.78 |
91.32 |
12,105.29 |
67,465.39 |
Mattison |
Miriam |
|
04/25/2022 |
|
60.95 |
108,537.12 |
|
11,986.08 |
120,523.20 |
Post |
Kevin |
OUTREACH LIBRARIAN |
10/18/2004 |
|
32.15 |
52,833.70 |
|
11,963.16 |
64,796.86 |
Eyal |
Suseela |
YOUTH LIBRARIAN |
05/21/2007 |
|
32.62 |
53,976.02 |
|
11,799.27 |
65,775.29 |
Cole |
Melissa |
LIBRARY HEAD 1 |
01/28/2008 |
|
43.36 |
75,679.83 |
|
11,795.99 |
87,475.82 |
Tang |
Courtney |
TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIAN |
09/21/2015 |
|
32.62 |
55,325.75 |
|
11,649.52 |
66,975.27 |
Lemmon |
Christopher |
SYSTEMS ANALYST |
12/05/2005 |
|
36.84 |
62,751.59 |
|
11,512.45 |
74,264.04 |
Zayko |
Katherine |
YOUTH LIBRARIAN |
11/01/2004 |
|
29.78 |
49,964.44 |
|
11,257.24 |
61,221.68 |
Abood |
Jill |
OUTREACH LIBRARIAN |
09/10/2004 |
|
32.62 |
54,580.48 |
|
11,194.73 |
65,775.21 |
Antaya |
Jeffrey |
LIBRARY HEAD 1 |
01/04/2005 |
|
32.94 |
55,428.16 |
|
10,967.13 |
66,395.29 |
Chartrand |
Robert |
|
03/04/2019 |
|
32.46 |
55,974.47 |
|
10,679.94 |
66,654.41 |
Veselovsky |
Helen |
|
11/05/2001 |
|
33.30 |
56,780.53 |
|
10,329.16 |
67,109.69 |
Garza |
Marisela |
YOUTH SPECIALIST |
07/28/2008 |
|
32.77 |
56,092.99 |
|
10,036.38 |
66,129.37 |
I knew from the payroll reports of other agencies
that the Regular Wages, Overtime and Miscellaneous fields are likely
totals with detail behind them. For example, the City of Lansing - in
addition to Regular Wages, Overtime and Miscellaneous - has a Buyout
field that is the sum of the following:
PERSONAL LV BUYOUT
HOLIDAY BAL BUYOUT
LONGEVITY BUYOUT
SICK LEAVE BUYOUT
VACATION LV BUYOUT
COMP TIME BUYOUT
OPT OUT BUYOUT
I was interested in the Miscellaneous detail
because if Miscellaneous was included in final average compensation (FAC)
at retirement, it would boost the pension. In my January story "Taxpayers
bail out underfunded CADL pension fund" I said that CADL administrators
had a pretty generous retirement plan. Enhanced FAC would make the
pension even
more generous. So I asked
|
What kind of payments
comprise Miscellaneous?
|
|
Jenny replied on April 18:
|
That is total wages minus the regular and overtime. Any other
earning code would make up that Miscellaneous column. Earning
codes could be a lot of things like vacation, holidays, etc.
|
|
I wanted to know what payments comprise
Miscellaneous, and her reply contained a bunch of words but did not
answer the question. It was doubletalk. Her next statement seemed to confirm that I was getting into something she
preferred not to talk about:
|
I've done my
best to provide what I can, and we've met your FOIA request. I
hope you understand that I won't be able to continue discussing
this matter further. |
|
On April 19, I sent a new FOIA request:
-
I would like the 2023 payroll file you
provided initially, but with all the Miscellaneous payment
detail added for each employee. When I say payment detail, I
mean the individual payments that make up the Miscellaneous
total. That may be what you refer to as earnings codes. I would
also like the descriptions that go with the earnings codes. They
may be provided separately.
-
I would like to know if all the earnings
codes for Regular, Overtime and Miscellaneous are included in
FAC when calculating the pension amount. If any are excluded, I
would like to know which ones they are.
Jenny replied on April 22:
|
Hello Steve, I have the information (2
parts) you requested:
1) Payroll file spreadsheet is attached
2) The Health Waiver column is not included
in the calculation for pension amount. |
|
The
file she attached raised more questions. It had some new columns:
Bonus
Director's Award
Double Time Wages
Funeral Leave
Health Waiver
Holiday
Jury Duty
Merit Increase Pay
New Year
Personal
Retro Pay
Sick
Vacation
Vacation Payout
There was also a column for Overtime, but not for
Regular Wages or Miscellaneous.
On May 3, I wrote
|
Jenny, I received the 2nd file and have more questions.
- Why aren't
you listed? Were you hired after the end of 2023?
- Why are there only 296 records on
the first file but 315 on the second?
- It appears that the components of
Miscellaneous are Overtime, Bonus, Director's Award,
Double Time Wages, Funeral Leave, Health Waiver,
Holiday, Jury Duty, Merit Increase Pay, New Year,
Personal, Retro Pay, Sick, Vacation, and Vacation
Payout. How can Overtime be included as a component
of Miscellaneous and be counted separately as
Overtime?
- For Scott Duimstra, Retro Pay
does not seem to be included in the Miscellaneous
total. Same for Danielle Pulling.
- For MIchelle Mudar, Double Time
Wages don't seem to be
included in the Miscellaneous total. Same for
Susanna Andrews and Eric Bayliss.
My guess is that your payroll file is similar to the
payroll file provided by the City of Lansing. The
City's file has totals for regular pay, overtime,
miscellaneous and buyout, and within each of those
categories there is a breakdown by payment type.
Your payment type Retro Pay probably belongs with
Regular Wages and Double Time Wages belongs with
Overtime. The solution may be to provide the Regular
Wage total followed by all the payment types that
make up Regular Wages, then the Overtime total
followed by all the payment types that make up
Overtime, then the Miscellaneous total followed by
all the payment types that make up Miscellaneous.
I would also like
the details of Scott Duimstra's pension. I would
like the monthly amount, the FAC, the multiplier and the
years of service.
And I would like the employee handbook for each employee
group. I believe they are on the employee intranet.
Thanks. |
|
Jenny replied on
May 6:
|
Hello Steve, I’m sure you’re aware FOIA does not require answers to
questions. I've done my best to provide you with the documents CADL has
responsive to your requests and we've met your FOIA requests. I hope you
understand that I won't be able to continue discussing this matter
further. |
|
I replied the same day:
|
Jenny - yes, I have been told
before that the FOIA does not require you to answer
questions. But it does not prohibit public officials from
answering questions. The act says that all persons are entitled
to full and complete information regarding the affairs of
government and the official acts of those who represent them,
and by placing artificial obstacles in the path of obtaining
that information, you are violating the spirit of the Michigan
Freedom of Information Act. If you know of a document that will
provide the information I am asking for, it is your duty as a
public servant to provide that document. The City of Lansing,
BWL and CATA have all provided detailed payroll information, and
I'm sure you can too. You provided a nearly complete payroll
file the same day I requested it. When I ask for the details of
Scott Duimstra's pension, that is not just a question - it is a
request for the document that shows the calculation of his
pension. And when I ask for the employee handbook for each
employee group, that is pretty specific.
I don't think you want to be seen by
the people of the county as a public official who goes out
of her way to conceal information from the public.
If you fail to deliver any part of my
FOIA request, I will appeal to the chairman of the CADL
board. Please provide his name and contact information.
|
|
This time, the
response
came from Lindsay Dangle of the law firm Murphy & Spagnuolo. She said
that Scott Duimstra is not yet eligible to receive a pension. (Oops - I
assumed he had retired when he left on October 6 of 2023. But he
probably is not old enough. He can't receive a pension until he is 55.)
She also attached 5 documents that apparently were the closest they had
to "employee handbooks". Here they are:
Library Heads
Mid-level Supervisory
Non-Union Administrative
Non-Union Page
Professional and Technical
She also said I could appeal to "the
head of the public body (in this case, Jenny Marr)".
I replied on May 11:
|
Lindsay, thank you for your response to my FOIA request.
I accept that no information
exists for Scott Duimstra's retirement since he has not
retired. And I thank you for the employee handbooks/union
contracts. However, I would still like a full 2023 payroll
file that includes all the information Jenny provided
previously plus the detail of regular pay, overtime,
miscellaneous and buyout. If you have any questions on what
I need, please call me at 517-730-2638.
I do not agree that my appeal
must be directed to CADL Executive Director Jenny Marr. The
FOIA says the appeal must be to the head of the public body,
but does not define public body [yes, it does]. However, the Open Meetings
Act defines public body as "any
state or local legislative or governing body, including a
board, commission, committee, subcommittee, authority, or
council, that is empowered by state constitution, statute,
charter, ordinance, resolution, or rule to exercise
governmental or proprietary authority or perform a
governmental or proprietary function...." That would be the
CADL board. Besides, it would make no sense to appeal to the
person who denied the request in the first place.
|
|
I was wrong about "public body" not being defined
in the
Freedom of Information Act. It is. The definition has several parts, but
the one that best applies to the library is
|
A county, city, township,
village, intercounty, intercity, or regional governing body,
council, school district, special district, or municipal
corporation, or a board, department, commission, council, or
agency thereof. |
|
Lindsay Dangle replied on May 21:
|
I’m not sure what you meant by
this email. However, I have checked with CADL and there are no
documents responsive to your FOIA request other than what has
already been produced. Director Marr already produced to you
the payroll information available. If you would like to file an
appeal you will need to follow the procedure outlined in my May
10, 2024 correspondence. Thank you. |
|
Maybe the reason they want my appeal to go to Jenny
Marr is they don't want the CADL board to know about this.
I responded the same day:
|
Lindsay, Director Marr may
have provided all the information I requested, but there are
some confusing discrepancies.
For one, the first file
provided had 296 rows/records. The second, which was to
provide the detail of Miscellaneous, had 315 rows/records.
There was no explanation of the difference, or advice on
which file to use.
The second file
contained additional detail. However, it raised further
questions. In my response, I said
-
It appears that the components
of Miscellaneous are Overtime, Bonus, Director's Award,
Double Time Wages, Funeral Leave, Health Waiver, Holiday,
Jury Duty, Merit Increase Pay, New Year, Personal, Retro
Pay, Sick, Vacation, and Vacation Payout. How can Overtime
be included as a component of Miscellaneous and be counted
separately as Overtime?
-
For Scott Duimstra, Retro Pay
does not seem to be included in the Miscellaneous total.
Same for Danielle Pulling.
-
For MIchelle Mudar, Double
Time Wages don't seem to be included in the Miscellaneous
total. Same for Susanna Andrews and Eric Bayliss.
All legitimate questions, I
think.
Director Marr's response was
"I’m sure you’re aware FOIA does not require answers to
questions. I've done my best to provide you with the
documents CADL has responsive to your requests and we've met
your FOIA requests. I hope you understand that I won't be
able to continue discussing this matter further."
If you are sure you won't
provide clarification, please let me know. This will make a
fun story for my website.
|
|
Lindsay Dangle replied on May 23:
|
As you accurately quoted from Ms. Marr,
CADL is trying to be cooperative and has provided you with the
documents we have responsive to each of your requests within the
boundaries of the Freedom of Information Act. To help you
understand, in response to each of your requests, CADL has asked
its payroll vendor to run a report of the data available based
upon the data points you included in that request. If you have
specific data points you want included in a singular document,
you are welcome to make a more detailed FOIA request that
includes exactly what inputs you are looking for and CADL will
do what it can to accommodate your request under the Act.
Clearer details will help us expedite the process and ensure we
locate the records you are looking for. However, since the FOIA
does not require CADL to answer questions or perform analysis of
documents, we won't be able to fulfill that request. If you
would like to file an appeal you will need to follow the
procedure outlined in my May 10, 2024 correspondence. Thank you.
|
|
I have no plans to pursue the matter further.
Analysis of data received
Two files with payroll data have been provided, one
on April 11 and one on April 22. Here are the files exactly as received.
They are "spreadsheets" - Excel files. You can download them.
April 11 - This file had 296 lines/records with basic payroll
information.
April 22 - This file had 315 lines/records similar to the first
but with added detail for Miscellaneous.
I made copies of the files and then sorted them in
various sequences. The following are from the April 11 file. No download
necessary.
Sorted by
name
Sorted by
total earnings
Sorted by
salary
Sorted by
miscellaneous (only 220 employees had miscellaneous payments)
Sorted by
overtime (only 58 employees had overtime income)
The April 22 report was supposed provide the
components of Miscellaneous. It did that, but also included some other
fields that are not, such as Retro Pay and Double Time pay. I suspect they are components of Regular Wages, not Miscellaneous. On this report,
they serve only to confuse.
The April 22 file has so many columns that I could
not display all of them across a web page, like I could with the April
11 file. In addition to employee name and ID number, it contained the
columns listed below. I've linked to separate reports for all except Hourly and Earnings Totals.
"Hourly" in the April 22 report is a puzzle. It is
not the same as Regular Wages in the April 11 report. Regular Wages
includes Retro Pay; Hourly does not.
There is an Overtime column on both of the reports,
but they are not the same. 58 employees have overtime on the April 11
report, while only 23 do on the April 22 report. For anyone who has
overtime
on both reports, the amounts are not the same.
Both files include multiple records for
some employees - usually 2, rarely 3. Jenny says this is because the person worked more than
one job during the year. The April 22 file contains more of these than
the April 11 file and that is why it contains 315 records and the April
11 file contains 296. I compared them
side-by-side here.
If there is anything that stands out in these
reports, it is the payments received in 2023 by former executive
director Scott Duimstra. He left on October 6, but did not retire -
probably because he had not reached age 55. He got the biggest
bonus, the fourth
biggest holiday
pay, the only
merit increase payment ($5,000), the largest
retro pay, the
third largest vacation,
and the third largest
vacation payout.
|
Bonus |
851.20 |
|
Holiday |
4,756.64 |
|
Merit Increase |
5,000.00 |
|
Personal |
1,186.69 |
|
Retro Pay |
1,379.43 |
|
Sick |
391.36 |
|
Vacation |
11,505.69 |
|
Vacation Payout |
14,424.00 |
|
Total: |
39,495.01 |
Except for the merit increase, which looks like it
was created especially for him, all these could have been legitimate. He
worked there for 18 years and if he didn't take vacations, he could
easily have accumulated $14,424 in vacation pay. Same for holiday. The
thing about large payments at retirement (or in the last year) is that
they increase FAC (final average compensation), a factor in the pension
calculation, and therefore boost the pension.
So questions remain. Too bad the FOIA
does not require CADL to answer questions.
Send comments, questions, and tips to
stevenrharry@gmail.com or call or text
me at 517-730-2638. If you'd like to be notified by email when I post a
new story, let me know.
A reminder that you can find detailed payroll
reports for the City of Lansing, the Board of Water & Light and Capital
Area Transportation Authority for several past years
here.
Previous stories
|